An article (by a findlaw writer) on CNN about the legal precedent that may apply to the Karl Rove identity leak case.
Stuff that catches my attention, including rugby, current events, links, and other important information.
Blogus
Blog Archive
-
▼
2005
(60)
-
▼
July
(6)
- Here's the deal: I'm supposed to be in Costa Rica...
- I'm leaving for Costa Rica tomorrow morning. I'm ...
- So my boss had me helping him with a presentation ...
- An article (by a findlaw writer) on CNN about the ...
- If manhattan can do it, so can you!
- Ok, ok. I know. You're sick of me posting stuff ...
-
▼
July
(6)
1 comment:
It's a good case, but it's a BS way to claim that the original Treason case isn't valid. First off "intentionally" is a far weaker standard than "knowing," and the fact that the CIA sought to keep a non-diplomatic agent's identity concealed automatically is assumed. He can also be charged with unlawful possession of classified information.
Basically, the dude's fucked, the Federal judges all hate Bush because of the Schiavo thing, and the facts are stacked against Rove. And once the boys in the penitentiary find out who he is...
Post a Comment